William Kilpatrick has written an insightful article concerning the influx of Muslim migrants into Western nations, including America. As usual, when it comes to understanding Islam, one need only look to historical precedents — beginning with prophet Muhammad himself, whose example 98% of all refugees being accepted into the U.S. follow. The key excerpt from Kilpatrick’s article follows:
As concerns the Syrian refugee crisis, Christians are regularly reminded that the Holy Family were once refugees in Egypt. Yes, but the culture brought into the world by the Holy Family is worlds apart from the one introduced six centuries later by Muhammad.
Let’s not forget that the Holy Family were once refugees. But in regard to the present crisis there’s another and perhaps more appropriate analogy to consider: Muhammad and his followers were also once refugees. He and his group of about 100 men, women, and children had long overstayed their welcome in Mecca. According to Muslim chroniclers, they had to flee in order to avoid persecution. Fortunately for Muhammad, the more “enlightened” citizens of Medina extended an invitation to the Muslims to come and live in their city. It is not recorded whether or not they held up large “welcome refugees” banners as is now the custom at European train stations, but they soon enough experienced the kind of regrets that Europeans are now having. Muhammad gradually acquired wealth and converts, and within a half-dozen years he was the master of Medina. Those Medinans who were not exiled or slaughtered were thoroughly subjugated. Muhammad then used Medina as the launching pad for his conquest of all Arabia. Within a century of his death, his followers had conquered nearly half of the civilized world.
Moreover, why was Muhammad “persecuted” in the first place, as Islamic hagiography holds? Because he was telling the people of Mecca how to live their lives — that is, by abandoning their gods and traditions and accepting his “revelations,” now known as Sharia. So they drove him out, he was accepted as a “refugee” in Medina, and the rest is history — a history that continues repeating itself till the present day.
For more historical precedents, read “Europe Should Learn Ethiopia’s Islam Lesson,” and see how the African nation’s hospitality to Muhammad’s disciples ended.
Enter liberal white Islam apologists stage left. No need for brown apologists when you have white liberals doing the work for you.
unfortunately there are a lot of brown useful idiots too. (apologist in this sense means ‘useful idiot).
an excellent article. History repeats itself so we’d better learn it.
What a perfect plan to nullify the nations – to kill the countries – to break the borders! Import Mohammedans by the millions who are never grateful because, much like criminals, they believe that we have somehow taken from them something they never had. They believe that what’s yours is actually theirs. Our Great Ones think that the Mohammedans will clear the path toward world unity with their incessant demands for accommodation, welfare and submission thereby overwhelming all host countries. But history is on the side of the Mohammedans: Every leftist revolution has consumed it’s own children; but Islam has ended up owning every country into which they have been invited. Not a perfect plan after all, but the Great Ones of the West are desperate enough to take that chance.
The Arab leaders of Medina heard that there was an Arab claiming to be a prophet in Mecca. They were envious of the Jews because the Jews were prosperous and boasted frequently of their prophets. So the Arab leaders of Medina had the idea of inviting in that madman from Mecca and pretending to believe in his prophethood to show up the Jews and reduce their influence and prestige (Look Jews, now we a prophet too! What do you think of that?). This nearly perfect plan mostly worked; the madman from Mecca got rid of the Jews, distributed the loot but subordinated the Medinans to the Meccans and spiritually enslaved them forever.