![](https://i0.wp.com/www.raymondibrahim.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ap24082672049020.jpg?resize=990%2C614&ssl=1)
Was the Islamic State (ISIS) behind the Crocus City Hall terror attack in Moscow that killed 139 and wounded 182 on Mar. 22, 2024, or not?
The Islamic State did claim the attack, and the Western mainstream is agreed that the terror group was, indeed, behind it. On Mar. 25, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said,
ISIS bears the sole responsibility here — the sole responsibility. And Mr. Putin understands that… [T]here is no evidence — absolutely no evidence that Ukraine was involved here.
Jean-Pierre specifically referred to a March 7 U.S. public advisory which warned Americans in Russia to avoid concert venues due to a threat of attacks by “extremists.”
Russia, on the other hand, while agreeing that the perpetrators were, in Putin’s words, “radical Islamists,” believes that they were ultimately working for—hence captured fleeing to—Ukraine.
Where’s the truth?
Unfortunately, it’s hard to take the “word” of the Biden administration on anything. Moreover, it is only to be expected that the White House would shield Ukraine—its close ally and recipient of $75 billion + in U.S. tax dollars—from any suspicion. As for warning against—meaning foreknowing about—Islamic terror attacks targeting Russian concert halls, this fact can be understood, and is being understood in Russian circles, in a completely different way.
Finally, that Muslim terrorists would randomly pick Russia, of all nations, to attack now—when it is at war with another Western nation—does seem to be more than a “coincidence.”
And yet, there are some overlooked points to consider—especially concerning this last observation—that do lend weight to the view that ISIS is behind the attack.
For starters, because ISIS and its followers are strict and literal adherents to Islamic teachings, their behavior often comes off as counterintuitive if not downright erratic. For instance, in early January, 2024, ISIS issued a statement arguing that true Muslims must not support or fight on behalf of the Palestinian Authority; that the very idea of “Palestinian liberation” is a joke; and that Shia Iran—while presenting itself as the great enemy of Israel—is the true enemy of Muslims (in fact, this ISIS statement came a day after the terror group claimed another attack, on Kerman, Iran, where some 100 were killed).
Needless to say, many Muslims were shocked by this statement (prompting renewed allegations that ISIS is a creation of the CIA, etc.). And yet, all of ISIS’s seemingly counterintuitive claims were (as more closely discussed here) consistent with Islamic teachings.
As one example, why should Muslims, ISIS argued, support or fight for the Palestinian Authority against Israel, when the PA is secular and does not enforce sharia—meaning it is an apostate entity that only pays lip service to Islam? Why bother empowering one infidel (PA) over another (Israel)?
As to what Muslims should be doing, this was reflected in the title of ISIS’s statement—“Kill Them Wherever You Find Them”—a paraphrase of Koran 9:5, known in Islamic jurisprudence as the “Verse of the Sword” (which alone has abrogated 124 other, more peaceful, verses):
… Kill the mushrikin [pagans, idolaters, in short, non-Muslims] wherever you find them—capture them, besiege them, and lie in wait for them on every way.
ISIS further expounded on how best to realize Koran 9:5, and so “heal Muslim hearts,” by urging the “lions of Islam”—meaning any would-be jihadists—to,
Chase your preys whether Jewish, Christian or their allies, on the streets and roads of America, Europe, and the world. Break into their homes, kill them and steal their peace of mind by any means you can lay hands on…. : detonate explosives, burn them with grenades and fiery agents, shoot them with bullets, cut their throats with sharp knives, and run them over with vehicles…. Come at them from every door, kill them by the worst of means, turn their gatherings and celebrations into bloody massacres, do not distinguish between a civilian kaffir [infidel], and a military one, for they are all kuffar [infidels] and the ruling against them is one.
What happened in Moscow completely conforms to this early January call by ISIS, irrespective of all suspicions and curious circumstances otherwise (war with Ukraine, etc.). On the Koran’s mandate to “kill them wherever you find them,” Muslims—ethnic Tajiks, descendants of the Turco-Tatars who terrorized Christian Russia for centuries—found a large “gathering and celebration” of their historic archenemies and turned it into a “bloody massacre.”
Such is the seeming caprice and nihilism of Islamic terrorism: it knows no bounds and can strike at any time and any place, without rhyme or reason—as evidenced by all of the random terror attacks to plague Western cities in recent years: the Madrid 2004 and London 2005 train bombings (193 and 56 killed, respectively); the many in France, including Paris 2015 and Nice 2016 (137 and 87 killed); Brussels 2016 (35 killed), and Barcelona 2017 (24 killed)—to name but a few.
While one can read into any of these attacks—why they occurred when and where they did—such attacks could also be mere manifestations of Allah’s open-ended command to kill infidels wherever and whenever they are found.
Worth a read on the Crocus attack:
https://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=31765
I don’t know his sources here but he’s usually pretty reliable.
The Russians, as merciless as they have been known to be, already know from their never-fail interrogations exactly who was behind the Moscow slaughter. But why would they tell us? Especially, if it was the CIA.
Both.
I’m sure that these ISIS type groups both use and are used by non Muslim powers, as a means to further the overall triumph of Islam, while keeping their intent firmly on the fixed principles of their Jihad as you have well recorded in this and other articles. That is to say, if both parties to an agreement understand to help each other do something better that they’re doing anyway. ISIS gets funding and arms and equipment from somewhere after all, some type of middle men operate to get them what they want, and I’m sure some of their non ISIS facilitators have their own agendas. This has always been the case with Islam, from Count Julian, Landulph of Capua, John Cantacuzene bringing the Turks over during his civil war, and so on. They got what they wanted and so too did the Muslims.